There’s a famous story that says Connecticut banned pickles that didn’t bounce. And it makes people imagine a group of lawmakers dropping pickles on the floor, although that’s not exactly how it went down. What’s the actual truth behind this myth? That’s what we’re going to find out.
Featured Image Credit: Shutterstock.
What the myth claims
The myth states that Connecticut had a rule about pickles bouncing. Apparently, a pickle that didn’t bounce wasn’t legally a pickle, and it sounds like something that’d be in the fine print of an old law. But researchers have combed through the statutes, and nothing like that turned up. What they did find was interesting, though.
What actually happened in 1948
The whole thing dates back to an incident in 1948, when two sellers, Sidney Sparer & Moses Dexler, were busted in Ellington. They were allegedly selling spoiled pickles. As such, inspectors took some samples for testing, and the state decided the product wasn’t okay to eat under their food safety rules.
What the law covered at the time
Back then, the state’s food laws were rather straightforward. Selling anything rotten or decomposing was completely against the law, although there wasn’t a section for bouncing produce. The rules fell under the state’s food & drug regulations, which were modeled after federal standards, so anything spoiled was enough to take action.
Why “bounce” entered the story
Here’s where things took a funny turn. After the case made the news, reporters asked the state’s food commissioner, Frederick Holcomb, how to tell whether a pickle was any good. He said something along the lines of, “Drop it from about a foot. If it’s fresh, it’ll bounce.” It was this one quote that ended up being the part people remembered.
What penalties were imposed
Once the case wrapped up, the sellers had to pay fines, with Sparer facing the maximum penalty of $500. The pickles themselves didn’t get a second chance & were destroyed. Officials treated the whole thing like any other food safety violation, rather than a contest over produce physics.
What Connecticut’s statute says now
Chapter 418 of the state’s current food law has a lot to say about adulterated & misbranded food. It also covers unsanitary conditions and contamination, as well as labeling, but nothing about dropping pickles. The modern rules are meant to keep bad food off shelves, just like they were back then.
The federal backdrop that shaped state food laws
All of this happened after the framework set by the federal Food, Drug, & Cosmetic Act of 1938. Those rules helped states understand how to handle spoiled or mislabeled food. When Connecticut cracked down on those bad pickles, they were following the same rulebook as the rest of the country, just without the bouncing part.
Where the “bounce” line keeps popping up
But even now, the story refuses to disappear. Many people continue to spread the pickle law like it’s real, and sometimes the date changes or the names are dropped. But the bounce test part always stays. Unfortunately, it’s more myth than truth, and there was never an actual law against pickles that don’t bounce, just against spoiled food.
The following sources were consulted in the preparation of this article:
